Is Talent More Important Than Passion and Persistence?

In my Suspense/Thriller Writers’ group on Facebook, one author mentioned that she was skeptical of her ability to come up with an interesting idea. Horror writer Rob M. Miller gave a wonderful response that I’m reposting here. Considering the ephemeral nature of Facebook, in a couple of days his comment would have disappeared into the great maw of FB, and I didn’t want it to be lost forever. As to why Rob leaves such helpful and detailed comments, Rob told me, “I’ve been very blessed.  Have had several incredibly talented writers, authors, and editors … well, just give, and give so freely.  Facebook, and blogs like yours, offer opportunities to pay-it-forward.” So, here’s Rob’s take on talent:

Let’s shoot the elephant first: Maybe you have no talent.


But, hey, maybe…?

Talent, though, is over-rated. Heart trumps talent. As does persistence. Talent, or natural ability, only carries a person so far, and then it comes down to heart, passion, time, and yeah, work. Workworkwork. This holds true with just about anything. Certainly with the arts, but also with athletics. Is Michael Jordan a gifted athlete? Absolutely. But such an assertion also masks, or can easily gloss over all of Michael’s hard work.

Personally, I do believe that writers are born with some kind of special something, some X-factor, some proclivity for story, character, situation. It’s indefinable. Writers often don’t necessarily have genius intelligence quotients (I.Q.), but often do have very high emotional quotients (E.Q.).

One might theorize that writers are most often inherently empathetic, or for our sci-fi lovers, are empaths.

Maybe that’s it. At it’s core, maybe it’s about the ability to feel the pain of others.

Author and writing instructor Maralys Wills has put out that in her many decades of experience, she’s found quality writers to have two domineering traits: a) that the writer has been through trauma; and b) they tend to be optimists.

I tend to side with Mrs. Wills on this. (God help the writer who’s a pessimist.)

With that out of the way, let’s presume (’cause it’s better to be an optimist) that you have been born with that magical W chromosome that producers writers, then it can be a confidence issue.

This is common.

Jack Ketchum (or Dallas Meyer), one of Stephen King’s favorite authors — and one of mine — has mentioned more than once of having a writing friend, a gentleman with more “talent” than Jack, but who keeps his writing to himself, afraid to have it seen, afraid of rejection.

And, of course, even amongst the greats, or the commercially successful, one might be surprised to find that even these icons are still (and always have been) quite human. Stephen King has talked about finishing one’s various projects, that even when a writer thinks they’re producing crap, they can be wrong. The cliche is true: We are our own worst critics.

With writing books, classes, critique groups, online writing groups (like this one), etc., there’s often an arrogance involved. Even a necessary degree of arrogance — after all, if a writer didn’t have passion, and passionate opinions, what would they have to say or write about? End of the day, though, despite there actually being sound writing principles worthy of a craftsman taking the time to learn, writing well is often more about what not to do than what to do.


Look at the number of times writing rules are broken, and with great impact, such as with Cormac McCarthy work “The Road,” where established guides of good and proper grammar were tossed for the sake of story and delivery.

Sometimes a writer, even those blessed with talent, needs to simply put in the time. Often, this is easy, what with the necessary and very true maxim of: write write write, read read read, write write write.

Sure. But write what? Read what? Practice with what?

As a general rule, I say have your car book, your bedroom book, and yes, a bathroom book … works that are always being read. Always be reading something within your favorite genre of fiction, but always reading a non-fiction work, too, as well as a work on the craft of writing, and another tossed in that’s outside of your favorite genre … perhaps even a work that’s in a field you might not normally consider. For me, that’s chick lit. Though it was akin to pulling teeth, I determined to read Billie Letts’s work “Where the Heart is,” and “The Divine Secrets of the Ya-Ya Sisterhood” by Rebecca Wells. With Letts, I remember being alone in my apartment, taking a bath, reading the final pages, and bawling my eyes out, thankful that no one was around to see me break down. (So much for ever denigrating chick lit again.) And, of course, the novel by Wells is simply brilliant, and brilliantly written.

What else might a writer do?

The could — and probably should — write a bestseller.

In 2001, I attended the annual World Horror Convention in Seattle, Washington, where I met the iconic Michael Slade (pseudonym for Jay Clarke). This brilliant author, during one panel, suggested that developing writers could do far worse than sitting down and transcribing, word for word, one of their favorite bestselling works of fiction, the entire book, front to back.

Sound tedious? It is. And, at times, can be boring. But it helps. A lot. In my case, I spent a bit more than a week transcribing Stephen King’s novel “The Dark Half.” The rewards were many.

Doing such an exercise helps to force a writer to reverse engineer the structure of a book, of a part (i.e., Part I, II, III, etc.), of a chapter, of a scene, and yes, even with paragraphs and sentences. Grammar and punctuation is absorbed as well. So’s how to build suspense … how to characterize. Hell, a lot of things.

I’m thankful I took Mr. Slade at his word; I know many did not — and still don’t. It’s not hard to imagine, is it, that such an exercise would be off-putting? After all, it seems like work.

But that’s the answer for the writer, or a significant chunk of it: putting in the work. Optimism and work. Passion and work.

We should read garbage once in a while to bolster our self-confidence and the greats to remain humble. We should be happy where we’re at, but never satisfied.

And we should work.

We can do that.

Was I born with that amount of talent? With that? Have I been mightily blessed, or merely cursed with a love and desire to write, but without that special something?

Such questions don’t really help. They can, however, hobble an artist, which is never a good thing.

Better to persevere, remembering that those things which are too easily given are often too lightly valued. Better, perhaps, to, through blood, sweat, and tears, develop ourselves.

In the meantime, for something practical, if your own work appears to be missing some needed bit of pixie dust (and maybe it’s not), you might consider Michael Slade’s advice.

And do consider mine: there’s always better and worse writers out there besides ourselves. We are what we are, and we are stuck with ourselves. We have a tendency to flip back and forth between being very thin-skinned (’cause we’re emotionally connected), and covered in rhino-hide (a covering we also need), but let’s never get too wrapped up in comparing ourselves with others, or our work with the work of others. It’s a fruitless waste of time.

All we can really do is write the best we can, practice and learn, and do it all over again.

What fun, what pain, what adventure.


With a love for reading and writing that started in his youth, Rob has traveled far to get to the place where he can now concentrate on breaking into the horror market.

Born and raised in the “micro-hood” of Portland, Oregon, he grew up as the oldest of three children, the son of a book-lover and a book-hater.

It was after two years of free-lance stringer work, and a number of publishing credits, that he tired of non-fiction and decided to use his love of the dark, personal terrors, and talent with words to do something more beneficial for his fellow man -– SCARE THE HELL OUT OF HIM.

4 Responses to “Is Talent More Important Than Passion and Persistence?”

  1. leener814 Says:

    I read this article with great interest. All I’ve ever wanted to do was make a living writing, since I was a little child. I’ve spent my whole life writing and writing and writing some more; I’ve been told over and over that I’m loaded with talent. Yay. I have no idea what that even means or what to do with it. I have no idea how one goes about making a living writing. I spend my life writing but only a handful of people ever sees what I’ve written. So I think I will take your challenge to write out a favorite book front to back and then embark. Without another plan of attack, it sounds like a good start, which is more than I’ve ever had before!

    • Rob M. Miller Says:

      Dear leener814,

      Writers tend to be a very giving bunch. Author Pat Bertam certainly is. If ever you need a helping hand, some direction, tips, how-tos, there are groups, live and online where you can get what you need. If ever I can be of assistance, being one of those editor-types, feel free to e-mail me at

      In the meantime, may your horrors stay limited to the written page,

      All my best,

      Rob M. Miller

  2. Rod Marsden Says:

    Good article. As for talent being more important than persistance…I dob’t know. I KNOW I have persistence. Some writers have told me I have talent and have worked with me to bring it out.

    As for a best seller, it can mean getting rthe right subject for your novel at the right time and then you have to have the talent to pull it off.

    At a time when all sorts of horrors were emerging and still are emerging about the Catholic Church in the USA, particularly Boston, as well as Ireland and Australia, The Da Vinci Code was set to take off like a shot.

    Maybe enough time had gone by between Buffy and Twilight to make Twilight, a vamp novel aimed at teenage girls, a hit.

    And so it goes…

    Can any of this be predicted?. Probably. Could I do it some day? Probably.

    (Hey! Why not? If it’s said you have to have a slice of the arrogance pie to be a successful writer then cut me a slice. I’ll have it with coffee thank you very much!)

    I have my inspirations…Lewis Carroll and Franz Kafka for my latest novel Desk Job…but I am very much my own writer.

    Neither Carroll nor Kafka had the experiences I had in a mid-1990s office.

    Mind you though, Kafka knew about and did write about how the governments in his time often got things wrong with a one suit fits all mentality. This mentality is still around but it is a hell of a lot more active thanks to new methods of creating and maintaining propaganda initiatives. The internet wasn’t around in Kafka’s day but it has been around now for a while and it has made an impact.

    Does this sort of thing fascinate you? It does me because I can put myself into Kafka’s position as a public servant working in Prague in the early 20th Century. I canm also park Kafka in a more modern office and imagine his reactions to office life in the late 20th and early 21st Century.

    The slimy and somewhat weird nature of 19th Century politics can be found in Caroll’s Alice books. Politics in the late 20th and early 21st Century is a bit different but just as slimy with a tendency to be just as weird.

    As for war, the British were fighting in Afghanistan in the 19th Century. Here, in the 21st Century, there’s fighting in Afghanistan and the British are there as America’s allies. Australian are also there for the same reason but that’s not the point. The point here being that Afghanistan has been a hot spot, off and on now, for some time. I’m sure some people would not find this fascinating but I do.

    For me to spend any time on a novel I have to have some subject that fascinates me. I have to have reasons to write beside just getting stuff out there.

    A novel is a huge commitment in time and energy for both writer and reader. So what has this got to do with the article? I go along with the need for passion.

    I have read novels that taste of sawdust because there isn’t a drop of passion in the work. I don’t stick with a book like that for too long. It is a wonder the writer stuck with the writing of such a novel in the first place but, strangely enough, it does happen.

  3. A Kind of Screwtape Letter | Bertram's Blog Says:

    […] those comments here on this blog to make sure they didn’t get lost in the great maw of Facebook. (Is Talent More Important Than Passion andPersistence? and How many subplots in a novel […]

Leave a Reply to Rob M. Miller Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: