Every month I’ve been using a different tarot deck in an effort to see if the deck feels the same as the rest, or if it resonates with me. Although I like a couple of the decks better than any of the others, either because of size or feel or the artistry, I haven’t felt any special affinity with any of the cards.
This month’s choice of decks is the Jungian tarot, which is based on archetypal images designed to activate the imagination. According to the designer of the deck, most of the current values assigned to the various cards were arbitrarily developed in the nineteenth century by occult groups. By contrast, he says the attributions in the Jungian Tarot were painstakingly researched in an effort to relate tarot interpretation to more ancient traditions.
Sounds good, right? Well, today’s card, the ten of wands activates my imagination not at all. The image gives me the impression of being weirdly inappropriate since it seems sinister, and the ten of wands is a rather benign card relating to careful management, functioning within a large organization, success, the loneliness that comes from success, and reacting defensively to badly organized ideas. Which is not a whole lot different from the meanings assigned by other tarot interpreters. Most say the card is about success and the perhaps oppressive responsibilities one has to take on because of that success; a need for prioritizing, delegating, and sharing your burdens. (None of which seem to have any relation to my life at all.)
It almost seems as if the major arcana (the cards most people have heard of, such as the fool, the hanged man, the sun, the moon, etc) are the cards that every tarot artist and interpreter spend most time on, and the others are “also rans.” (Which is why so many readings, such as online readings, use only those twenty-two cards rather than all seventy-eight cards.)
When I do graduate from picking just one card to doing a periodic reading (weekly or monthly), chances are I will only use those twenty-two cards until I get familiar with how the cards fit together to show . . . well, to show whatever it is they are supposed to show. I still don’t know. I do know the tarot isn’t really about foretelling the future; it’s more about communicating with our deepest being, but so far, there’s not a hint of what I might be hiding in my innermost depths. It could be I have no such depths. It could be the cards are not speaking to me, and if they are, I haven’t learned to listen. It could be that the whole thing is hokum.
So far, the only imagination it has activated in me is the possibility of using the cards as story telling cards — using each of the face cards as a character, and surrounding them random cards to see how their lives would unfold. But the idea has gone no further than that. Nor have I deepened whatever intuition I might have or learned anything I don’t already know.
But I have the cards, so it does me no harm to pick one every day just to see what I pick.
While sorting through her deceased husband’s effects, Amanda is shocked to discover a gun and the photo of an unknown girl who resembles their daughter. After dedicating her life to David and his vocation as a pastor, the evidence that her devout husband kept secrets devastates Amanda. But Amanda has secrets of her own. . .
Click here to buy: Unfinished
February 1, 2021 at 7:18 pm
Just the image itself doesn’t resonate with me. Looks like a bunch of toothpicks or Hanukkah candles below a pair of eyes. Also, in my deck the Ten of Wands means feeling overburdened or weary, and determination is required. But then again, meaning can vary from interpretation/artist to interpretation/artist.
February 1, 2021 at 7:43 pm
That’s basically the same thing as what my various decks have said, though some interpretations try to put a happier slant on the matter.
I can already tell this is not going to be one of my favorite decks. So not attractive!
February 1, 2021 at 7:49 pm
Think you’ll go with a different one for the month?
February 1, 2021 at 9:42 pm
I’ll stick with it. There’s always next month!
February 2, 2021 at 5:32 am
And this one’s short, too.
February 2, 2021 at 9:17 am
That card image kind of bugs me. At first glance, it seems to be roughly symmetric on the vertical axis. In fact, the symmetry is so crude as to be non-existent – just a tarted up mess of awkward. Maybe I’m just reacting defensively to a badly organized idea?
February 2, 2021 at 11:24 am
No, you’re not reacting defensively. It bugs me, too. It’s a bizarre image that has nothing to do with the what it purports to mean. It looks badly organized to me, too! I wonder if there is something Jungian in that? Who knows.
February 3, 2021 at 12:21 pm
Are you using real decks of cards or decks displayed on the Internet?
February 3, 2021 at 4:10 pm
Real decks. I have dozens of them — I ended up with my brother’s collection.